You’re reading the October 2026 report. See November 2026, the latest →
The Human-Centered Language Benchmark · October 2026

October 2026 baseline

Does the standard hold on each new generation?

A generation is compared only with its predecessor in the same run: same requests, same judges, same standard. Each change gets one of three verdicts, and it counts only when its interval clears zero and it's at least 5 points with guidance or 10 points without.

Same-run pairs1
First looks8
Judge anchor checkNot set up yetStarts with the November run
Same model, month to monthNot reported yetWaits for the noise-floor measurement

Generation pairs

Predecessor Successor Too small to count 95% interval on the change

GPT-5.6 Luna to GPT-6 Luna

OpenAI · GPT Luna line · lineage proposed, confirm before publishing
Human-centered Without guidance No detectable change
Need revision, 0 to 60% GPT-5.6 Luna 7 of 68 (10.3%), GPT-6 Luna 4 of 68 (5.9%)
Change in points, −40 to +40 −4.4 points, interval −13.2 to +2.9. Counts only beyond ±10.
Human-centered Human-centered guidance No detectable change
Need revision, 0 to 60% GPT-5.6 Luna 1 of 68 (1.5%), GPT-6 Luna 0 of 68 (0.0%)
Change in points, −40 to +40 −1.5 points, interval −4.4 to 0.0. Counts only beyond ±5.
Trauma-informed Without guidance No detectable change
Need revision, 0 to 60% GPT-5.6 Luna 5 of 24 (20.8%), GPT-6 Luna 2 of 24 (8.3%)
Change in points, −40 to +40 −12.5 points, interval −29.2 to 0.0. Counts only beyond ±10.
Trauma-informed Trauma-informed guidance No detectable change
Need revision, 0 to 60% GPT-5.6 Luna 3 of 24 (12.5%), GPT-6 Luna 2 of 24 (8.3%)
Change in points, −40 to +40 −4.2 points, interval −12.5 to 0.0. Counts only beyond ±5.

What this run can see

With 68 drafts per model per condition, a change has to be about 20 points to show reliably when about 30% of drafts need revision, and about 7 points when about 2% do. So the Benchmark can catch a generation that falls apart under guidance. It can't separate two models that both sit near zero, and it says so instead of calling a winner.

First looks

Family view by lab
Model Lab Snapshot Days before the run Generation verdict
Claude Opus 5.5 Anthropic Sep 21, 2026 29 No tested predecessor; placement only
Claude Sonnet 5.5 Anthropic Sep 28, 2026 22 No tested predecessor; placement only
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash DeepSeek Oct 17, 2026 3 No tested predecessor; placement only
Gemini 4 Argon Google Oct 13, 2026 7 No tested predecessor; placement only
GPT-6 Luna OpenAI Sep 22, 2026 28 Paired with GPT-5.6 Luna, same run
GPT-6.1 Sol OpenAI Sep 29, 2026 21 No tested predecessor; placement only
Muse Wonder Meta Oct 12, 2026 8 No tested predecessor; placement only
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL NVIDIA Oct 15, 2026 5 No tested predecessor; placement only
Table design inspired by EQ-Bench, by Sam Paech. Benchmark engineered by MKTNG.
Tell us

Tell us what you think

Something look off? A model you want tested? Putting a result to use?

What’s this about? Optional